Thanks for the report, HJ. And thanks for finding the problem Dominique
before I could even look at the PR. (I have no idea how the typo ended
up in my local patch file - it was clearly not present when I regtested
the patch.)
I have committed the attached patch as obvious - after regtesting. (Rev.
177799.)
Tobias
H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Tobias Burnus<bur...@net-b.de> wrote:
Build and regtested on x86-64-linux.
This caused: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50094
Index: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/ChangeLog (Revision 177797)
+++ gcc/fortran/ChangeLog (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2011-08-16 Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de>
+ Dominique Dhumieres <domi...@lps.ens.fr>
+
+ PR fortran/50094
+ * resolve.c (resolve_symbol): Fix stupid typo.
+
2011-08-15 Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de>
* resolve.c (resolve_symbol): Fix coarray result-var check.
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (Revision 177797)
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -12257,7 +12257,7 @@ resolve_symbol (gfc_symbol *sym)
|| sym->attr.codimension)
&& (sym->attr.result || sym->result == sym))
{
- gfc_error ("Function result '%s' at %L shallolvnot be a coarray or have "
+ gfc_error ("Function result '%s' at %L shall not be a coarray or have "
"a coarray component", sym->name, &sym->declared_at);
return;
}
