On 08/27/2013 02:46 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
Okay. As it stands, it means that you get an additional 'const' in
diagnostics for lambda's not declared 'mutable'.
Hmm, I guess it would be preferable to use 'mutable' or nothing when
printing the lambda just like when declaring one.
Jason
Hi Jason,
Was just about to compose a mail to gcc-patches... Been busy, then
ill, now just about ready to submit a new set of diffs.
On 27.08.2013 17:47, Jason Merrill wrote:
This patch doesn't seem to depend on the others; go ahead and apply
it.
Okay. As it stands, it means that you ge
This patch doesn't seem to depend on the others; go ahead and apply it.
Jason
