Hi Jason,
Was just about to compose a mail to gcc-patches... Been busy, then
ill, now just about ready to submit a new set of diffs.
On 27.08.2013 17:47, Jason Merrill wrote:
This patch doesn't seem to depend on the others; go ahead and apply
it.
Okay. As it stands, it means that you get an additional 'const' in
diagnostics for lambda's not declared 'mutable'. I didn't think this to
be necessarily a bad thing (distinguishing between 'mutable' and 'plain'
lambdas and pointing at the cause for possible user error attempting to
write to by-value captures) but it's probably contentious. Do you want
me to ditch the 'const' output prior to pushing?
Cheers,
Adam
