On 05/10/14 13:58, Richard Sandiford wrote:
The rtx u2 field currently uses a desc/tag pair for GTY. This seems
unnecessary though, since the field is specifically supposed to be
32 bits wide on 64-bit hosts and so cannot hold a pointer.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
Thanks,
Rich
On May 12, 2014, at 3:53 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Yeah, but the reason I'm removing the desc/tag pair isn't so much to get
> rid of that (the compiler should do it for us) but because marking it
> anything other than "skip" gives the impression that we want to allow
> GC pointers in the uni
Michael Matz writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 10 May 2014, Mike Stump wrote:
>
>> > The rtx u2 field currently uses a desc/tag pair for GTY. This seems
>> > unnecessary though,
>>
>> > OK to install?
>>
>> Ick. I don’t favor skip. The change feels like a premature
>> optimization that doesn’t net a
Hi,
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Mike Stump wrote:
> > The rtx u2 field currently uses a desc/tag pair for GTY. This seems
> > unnecessary though,
>
> > OK to install?
>
> Ick. I don’t favor skip. The change feels like a premature
> optimization that doesn’t net any code gen benefit. I’ll defer to
On May 10, 2014, at 12:58 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> The rtx u2 field currently uses a desc/tag pair for GTY. This seems
> unnecessary though,
> OK to install?
Ick. I don’t favor skip. The change feels like a premature optimization that
doesn’t net any code gen benefit. I’ll defer to a
