>> In the case of loc_checksum(), we're tied to MD5 by the DWARF
>> standard. Otherwise, we could just rewrite it to use inchash
>> throughout.
>
> I'm not sure I understand the motivation. If gcc hashes in
> gcc specific stuff (and this hash, even before my changes is)
> then the output can never
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:48:58AM -0700, Cary Coutant wrote:
> > + /* ??? MD5 of another hash doesn't make a lot of sense... */
> > + hash = hstate.end();
> >CHECKSUM (hash);
>
> [citation needed] I don't see why you think that. Maybe it'd be nicer
> if we could use hash_loc_operands() to f
> + /* ??? MD5 of another hash doesn't make a lot of sense... */
> + hash = hstate.end();
>CHECKSUM (hash);
[citation needed] I don't see why you think that. Maybe it'd be nicer
if we could use hash_loc_operands() to feed its input directly into
the MD5 checksum, but I think in this case it'
