On 9/1/2014 5:50 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Since this now came up for the second time this year, I went ahead and
> applied the patch below.
Thanks for the comment :)
Honggyu
On 9/1/2014 7:11 AM, Robert Dewar wrote:
> Seems a shame that anyone should need an explanation, but oh well :-)
Sorry about that. I should have thought about it twice :)
> P.S. my favorite instance of this kind of documentation is an early IBM
> Fortran manual, which says that you should put exa
On 8/31/2014 4:49 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Mike Stump wrote:
These errors are on purpose.
Surprising that someone would not get this obvious clever joke.
-There are many places in which this document is incomplet and incorrekt.
+There are many places in which this docu
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Mike Stump wrote:
> These errors are on purpose.
>
>> -There are many places in which this document is incomplet and incorrekt.
>> +There are many places in which this document is incomplete or incorrect.
Since this now came up for the second time this year, I went ahead
and
On Aug 28, 2014, at 11:03 PM, Honggyu Kim wrote:
> This fixes some typo errors in the gcc internal document.
These errors are on purpose.
> -There are many places in which this document is incomplet and incorrekt.
> +There are many places in which this document is incomplete or incorrect.
