On 2/2/24 10:45, Alex Coplan wrote:
On 02/02/2024 09:34, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:27:23AM +, Alex Coplan wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin, OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Alex
-- >8 --
When __has_feature was introduced for GCC 14, I included the feature
c
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 05:32:31PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 11:27:09AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > With -pedantic-errors we would have __has_extension behaving like
> > > __has_feature, and I wanted to check in the test that this doesn't get
> > > reported as a fe
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 11:27:09AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > With -pedantic-errors we would have __has_extension behaving like
> > __has_feature, and I wanted to check in the test that this doesn't get
> > reported as a feature or extension.
>
> Oh I see. A comment to that effect might be
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 03:45:48PM +, Alex Coplan wrote:
> On 02/02/2024 09:34, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:27:23AM +, Alex Coplan wrote:
> > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin, OK for trunk?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > -- >8 --
> > >
>
On 02/02/2024 09:34, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:27:23AM +, Alex Coplan wrote:
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin, OK for trunk?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> > -- >8 --
> >
> > When __has_feature was introduced for GCC 14, I included the feature
> > cxx
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:27:23AM +, Alex Coplan wrote:
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin, OK for trunk?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> -- >8 --
>
> When __has_feature was introduced for GCC 14, I included the feature
> cxx_constexpr_string_builtins, since of the relevant string built
