On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 05:32:31PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 11:27:09AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > With -pedantic-errors we would have __has_extension behaving like > > > __has_feature, and I wanted to check in the test that this doesn't get > > > reported as a feature or extension. > > > > Oh I see. A comment to that effect might be helpful. > > Don't we have over 1200 other tests with dg-options "" which > don't have comments why they are doing that?
Yes, but the __has_extension / __has_feature thing doesn't seem obvious at all, and the test passed for me with and without dg-options "". But I'm fine with the patch either way. Marek
