After reviewing the entire dependencies to get this enabled by
default, our current plan is as follows:
1. Send a v2 (there still were outstanding comments against some
testcases) of the "turn on by default for -O2" patch.
2. Address PR118873, PR119862, and PR119884 before merging the patch
that tu
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 4:51 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/18/25 2:43 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> > Applied to trunk (16.0.0), thank you!
> > Should this be backported to the GCC-15 release branch as well?
> We don't have this on by default on the branch and it's a new option, so
> one could ma
On 4/18/25 4:37 PM, Sam James wrote:
Philipp Tomsich writes:
Applied to trunk (16.0.0), thank you!
Should this be backported to the GCC-15 release branch as well?
BTW, what's the plan for enabling this on trunk now by default? (I don't recall
if
some other issues were left.)
There's alr
Philipp Tomsich writes:
> Applied to trunk (16.0.0), thank you!
> Should this be backported to the GCC-15 release branch as well?
BTW, what's the plan for enabling this on trunk now by default? (I don't recall
if
some other issues were left.)
On 4/18/25 2:43 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
Applied to trunk (16.0.0), thank you!
Should this be backported to the GCC-15 release branch as well?
We don't have this on by default on the branch and it's a new option, so
one could make the argument it's not a regression and inappropriate.
But o
Applied to trunk (16.0.0), thank you!
Should this be backported to the GCC-15 release branch as well?
--Philipp.
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 10:10, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>
> Jeff,
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 at 01:48, Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/28/25 5:12 AM, Konstantinos Eleftheriou wrote:
Jeff,
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 at 01:48, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/28/25 5:12 AM, Konstantinos Eleftheriou wrote:
> > In the case that we are eliminating the load instruction, we use zero_extend
> > for the initialization of the base register for the zero-offset store.
> > This causes issues when
On 3/28/25 5:12 AM, Konstantinos Eleftheriou wrote:
In the case that we are eliminating the load instruction, we use zero_extend
for the initialization of the base register for the zero-offset store.
This causes issues when the store and the load use the same mode,
as we are trying to generate
