On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 4:51 PM Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 4/18/25 2:43 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote: > > Applied to trunk (16.0.0), thank you! > > Should this be backported to the GCC-15 release branch as well? > We don't have this on by default on the branch and it's a new option, so > one could make the argument it's not a regression and inappropriate. > But one could also make the argument that it's a lot harder to evaluate > the new option if it's ICEing due to this problem. > > I'd lean towards including it, but final call is Jakub or Richi, > particularly since we've branched for the gcc-15 release.
It's OK for the branch after the release of 15.1. Richard. > > jeff >
