On 23/02/19 10:55 +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I forgot to say that this is a conservative list of targets where
-fnon-call-exceptions is supported. Maybe it could run on other
targets, but this should be enough to ensure we don't get a regression
for this bug.
What do you mean by supported exac
> I forgot to say that this is a conservative list of targets where
> -fnon-call-exceptions is supported. Maybe it could run on other
> targets, but this should be enough to ensure we don't get a regression
> for this bug.
What do you mean by supported exactly? Ada and Go set it by default and th
On 23/02/19 01:26 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/02/19 02:06 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 01:02:20AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
PR libstdc++/89446
* include/bits/char_traits.h (__constant_char_array): Check index is
in range before derefere
On 23/02/19 01:02 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
+// { dg-options "-std=gnu++17 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions -O1" }
+// { dg-do run { target { powerpc*-*-linux* i?86-*-linux* x86_64-*-linux* } } }
I forgot to say that this is a conservative list of targets where
-fnon-call-exceptions is su
On 23/02/19 02:06 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 01:02:20AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
PR libstdc++/89446
* include/bits/char_traits.h (__constant_char_array): Check index is
in range before dereferencing.
* testsuite/21_strings/basic_strin
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 01:02:20AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> PR libstdc++/89446
> * include/bits/char_traits.h (__constant_char_array): Check index is
> in range before dereferencing.
> * testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/operators/char/89446.cc:
> New test.
