On 23/02/19 10:55 +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I forgot to say that this is a conservative list of targets where
-fnon-call-exceptions is supported. Maybe it could run on other
targets, but this should be enough to ensure we don't get a regression
for this bug.
What do you mean by supported exactly?
The manual for -fnon-call-exceptions says:
"Note that this requires platform-specific runtime support that does not exist
everywhere."
I don't know exactly what that means, so the test only runs on targets
where I know it works.
Ada and Go set it by default and they
are supported on a bunch of other targets...
It's not supposed to be an exhaustive list of targets where it's
supported. As I said, it's a conservative list.
It could run on more targets, but there might not be much benefit as
long as the test runs on some targets that get tested often.
