Here is the revisited version passing all tests successfully except 2
that are also failing without the patch:
FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/modifiers/insert/char/1.cc execution test
FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/modifiers/insert/wchar_t/1.cc execution test
This is a rather mechanical change exc
On 18/07/2017 16:03, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On 18 July 2017 at 16:31, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This is quite a huge change, so I'd like to wait and see if anyone
else has any opinion on it.
Personally I think it's necessary (assuming I understand the PR
correctly) and so if nobody objects I th
On 18 July 2017 at 16:31, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This is quite a huge change, so I'd like to wait and see if anyone
> else has any opinion on it.
>
> Personally I think it's necessary (assuming I understand the PR
> correctly) and so if nobody objects I think we should go with this
> change for
On 18/07/17 14:31 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 17/07/17 22:54 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
This is quite a huge change, so I'd like to wait and see if anyone
else has any opinion on it.
Personally I think it's necessary (assuming I understand the PR
correctly) and so if nobody objects I thi
On 17/07/17 22:54 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is the patch to fix libstdc++ versioned namespace.
Now versioned namespace is only at std and __gnu_cxx levels, not
anymore in nested namespaces.
PR libstdc++/81064
* include/bits/algorithmfwd.h: Reorganize versioned namespa
