On 18/07/2017 16:03, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On 18 July 2017 at 16:31, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
This is quite a huge change, so I'd like to wait and see if anyone
else has any opinion on it.
Personally I think it's necessary (assuming I understand the PR
correctly) and so if nobody objects I think we should go with this
change for GCC 8. Let's give it a few days for comments (and I'll
finish going through the patch carefully).
Looks like the right approach to me. I haven't looked at the patch in
detail, but the main gist
of it is something that we should certainly do for GCC 8. The Elf says "aye".
Thanks for the feedbacks.
However I've been a little bit too confident regarding its validation.
There are unexpected failures when versioned namespace is activated.
Most of them are related to its usage with experimental namespace. I
haven't yet fully consider it but just in case: do we really need to
have versioned namespace on top of experimental namespace ?
François
