Re: [PATCH] Fix noreorder symbol partitioning reversion.

2020-01-20 Thread Martin Liška
Hi. I've just tested the backport on both GCC 8 and 9 branches. I'm going to install it. Martin >From 4a856551c0f969be6525371892277c206b4181da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Liska Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:16:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Backport f48c6014133c8989702458f9082e34ba6dd326d4 gc

Re: [PATCH] Fix noreorder symbol partitioning reversion.

2020-01-18 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 20:43 +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > > Hi. > > > > The patch is fixes a regression in libgcrypt package where > > we incorrectly forget to stream out a definition of a no-reorder symbol. > > It's caused by LTO balanced map reversion, where we do not revert > > also best_noreo

Re: [PATCH] Fix noreorder symbol partitioning reversion.

2020-01-17 Thread Jeff Law
On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 20:43 +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > Hi. > > The patch is fixes a regression in libgcrypt package where > we incorrectly forget to stream out a definition of a no-reorder symbol. > It's caused by LTO balanced map reversion, where we do not revert > also best_noreorder_pos. > >

Re: [PATCH] Fix noreorder symbol partitioning reversion.

2020-01-16 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Hi. > > The patch is fixes a regression in libgcrypt package where > we incorrectly forget to stream out a definition of a no-reorder symbol. > It's caused by LTO balanced map reversion, where we do not revert > also best_noreorder_pos. > > It's pre-approved patch by Honza and I'm going to inst