On Fri, 22 Mar 2013, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > I think the wrong-code fix is orthogonal to code improvements
> > which will also trigger on the GIMPLE level (and where they
> > will have a bigger impact).
>
> I agree. I think the pa
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> I think the wrong-code fix is orthogonal to code improvements
> which will also trigger on the GIMPLE level (and where they
> will have a bigger impact).
I agree. I think the patch to calls is fine unless Jakub objects.
> We can for ex
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:06:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > This fixes PR56434 - the use of BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT to annotate
> > the pointer returned by malloc is wrong - BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT
> > has nothing to do with the alignment guaranteed by the A
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:06:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> This fixes PR56434 - the use of BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT to annotate
> the pointer returned by malloc is wrong - BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT
> has nothing to do with the alignment guaranteed by the ABI
> for allocated memory. For example on x86_64 i
