On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 07:26:52AM +, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
> … “Tunning” looks like a typo as well, should likely be “Tuning”.
You're right, but because like often it occurs in another place as well,
I've committed this separately as obvious.
Thanks for finding this.
2025-07-10 Jakub Jelin
> On 10 Jul 2025, at 08:09, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> While I'm not a native English speaker, I believe all the uses
> of bellow (roar/bark/...) in comments in gcc are meant to be
> below (beneath/under/...).
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
>
>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 8:13 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> While I'm not a native English speaker, I believe all the uses
> of bellow (roar/bark/...) in comments in gcc are meant to be
> below (beneath/under/...).
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK
On Thu 2025-07-10 08:09:50, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While I'm not a native English speaker, I believe all the uses
> of bellow (roar/bark/...) in comments in gcc are meant to be
> below (beneath/under/...).
FWIW I went through the patch and I agree that all of these should be 'below',
not
