On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Thanks, I've incorporated your and James' feedback.
> Since James ok'd the content of the patch from an AArch64 perspective
> I'll commit this later today if I receive no further feedback.
Thanks, Kyrill, those were quite some additions!
I made a few f
Hi Sandra,
On Sun, 24 Apr 2016, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> I haven't done a careful review of the whole section of existing text,
> but I did notice a few things in text not being touched by this patch:
I noticed not all of the changes you recommended actually have been
made, of which I now take
On 27/04/16 18:14, Jim Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Thanks, I've incorporated your and James' feedback.
Since James ok'd the content of the patch from an AArch64 perspective
I'll commit this later today if I receive no further feedback.
There is no para
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Thanks, I've incorporated your and James' feedback.
> Since James ok'd the content of the patch from an AArch64 perspective
> I'll commit this later today if I receive no further feedback.
There is no paragraph for the Qualcomm qdf24xx. Do
On 25/04/16 02:43, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 04/22/2016 03:57 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:15:17AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a proposed summary of the changes in the AArch64 backend for GCC 6.
If there's anything I've missed it's purely my oversigh
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Jim, you added support for the qdf24xx identifier to -mcpu and -mtune.
> Could you please suggest an appropriate entry to describe it?
> I think the same format as the Cortex-A35 entry in this patch would be
> appropriate.
This is tricky, a
On 04/21/16 03:15, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ok to commit?
LGTM
--
Evandro Menezes
On 04/22/2016 03:57 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:15:17AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a proposed summary of the changes in the AArch64 backend for GCC 6.
If there's anything I've missed it's purely my oversight, feel free to add
entries or suggest improv
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:15:17AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a proposed summary of the changes in the AArch64 backend for GCC 6.
> If there's anything I've missed it's purely my oversight, feel free to add
> entries or suggest improvements.
For me, I'm mostly happy with th
