One of these was a bug, though it doesn't affect regression testing.
commit c49bb7df1d286456f2e5738c05ea56e6816a7475
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Wed Oct 5 11:32:33 2016 -0400
* parser.c (cp_parser_skip_to_end_of_statement): Add missing break.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.c b/gcc/cp/call.c
inde
On 08/16/2016 10:59 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 04:49:30PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
A few more cases where I'm unsure whether the fall through is intended.
Jason, can you please look at the cp/ part?
Given Jason is on PTO this week, can I just commit the patch as-is, mo
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 04:49:30PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> A few more cases where I'm unsure whether the fall through is intended.
> Jason, can you please look at the cp/ part?
Given Jason is on PTO this week, can I just commit the patch as-is, modulo
the already-committed tree-complex.c par
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 09:20:36AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > --- gcc/gcc/tree-complex.c
> > +++ gcc/gcc/tree-complex.c
> > @@ -1336,6 +1336,8 @@ expand_complex_division (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi,
> > tree inner_type,
> >rr = gimplify_build2 (gsi, code, inner_type, ai, bi);
> >
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, Marek Polacek wrote:
> A few more cases where I'm unsure whether the fall through is intended.
> Jason, can you please look at the cp/ part?
> Richi, would you mind looking at the tree-complex.c bit?
> What 'bout the pch.c?
>
> Thanks,
>
> 2016-08-11 Marek Polacek
>
>
A few more cases where I'm unsure whether the fall through is intended.
Jason, can you please look at the cp/ part?
Richi, would you mind looking at the tree-complex.c bit?
What 'bout the pch.c?
Thanks,
2016-08-11 Marek Polacek
PR c/7652
gcc/
* tree-complex.c (expand_complex_d
