On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 09:20:36AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > --- gcc/gcc/tree-complex.c
> > +++ gcc/gcc/tree-complex.c
> > @@ -1336,6 +1336,8 @@ expand_complex_division (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, 
> > tree inner_type,
> >        rr = gimplify_build2 (gsi, code, inner_type, ai, bi);
> >        ri = gimplify_build2 (gsi, code, inner_type, ar, bi);
> >        ri = gimplify_build1 (gsi, NEGATE_EXPR, inner_type, ri);
> > +      /* XXX Really fallthru?  */
> > +      /* FALLTHRU */
> >  
> 
> 
> Nope, looks like a bug to me.

Thanks, thus:

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, applying to trunk.

2016-08-12  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>

        PR c/7652
        * tree-complex.c (expand_complex_division): Add missing break.

diff --git gcc/tree-complex.c gcc/tree-complex.c
index d7baf22..7668520 100644
--- gcc/tree-complex.c
+++ gcc/tree-complex.c
@@ -1336,6 +1336,7 @@ expand_complex_division (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree 
inner_type,
       rr = gimplify_build2 (gsi, code, inner_type, ai, bi);
       ri = gimplify_build2 (gsi, code, inner_type, ar, bi);
       ri = gimplify_build1 (gsi, NEGATE_EXPR, inner_type, ri);
+      break;
 
     case PAIR (ONLY_REAL, VARYING):
     case PAIR (ONLY_IMAG, VARYING):

        Marek

Reply via email to