> -Original Message-
> From: Georg-Johann Lay []
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 1:03 PM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis; Richard Guenther; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Denis
> Chertykov; Joerg Wunsch
> Subject: Re: [Patch,avr] PR54461: Better AVR-Libc
Weddington, Eric wrote:
>
>> From: Georg-Johann Lay
>>
>> So here is an updated version of the patch.
>> Instead of "with_avrlibc = yes" it does "with_avrlibc != no".
>>
>> Just like the first version, --with-avrlibc[=*] is only recognized
>> if avr-gcc is not configured for RTEMS, i.e. RTEMS user
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Weddington, Eric wrote:
>>
> Can you explain this? A typical build of avr tools goes like
>
> 1) configure, build and install binutils
> 2) configure, build and install the compiler
> 3) configure, build and install AVR
> -Original Message-
> From: Georg-Johann Lay []
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:00 PM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis; Richard Guenther; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Denis
> Chertykov; Joerg Wunsch
> Subject: Re: [Patch,avr] PR54461: Better AVR-Lib
Weddington, Eric wrote:
>
Can you explain this? A typical build of avr tools goes like
1) configure, build and install binutils
2) configure, build and install the compiler
3) configure, build and install AVR-Libc
so that in step 2 no checking is possible becaus
> -Original Message-
> From: dosr...@gmail.com [] On Behalf Of Gabriel Dos
> Reis
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 9:08 AM
> To: Richard Guenther
> Cc: Georg-Johann Lay; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Denis Chertykov; Weddington,
> Eric; Joerg Wunsch
> Subject:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
>> Can you explain this? A typical build of avr tools goes like
>>
>> 1) configure, build and install binutils
>> 2) configure, build and install the compiler
>> 3) configure, build and install AVR-Libc
>>
>> so that in step 2 no checking i
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
>>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
>>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
AVR-Libc comes with hand-optimized float support function
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
>>
>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>
> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
>>
>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>> AVR-Libc comes with hand
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
>>
>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>
> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
>>
>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>> AVR-Libc comes with hand
Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
AVR-Libc comes with hand-optimized float support functions
written in assembler. These functions use the same naming
conventions like libgcc.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
>>
>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>
> AVR-Libc comes with hand-optimized float support functions written
> in assembler. These functions
2012/9/4 Joerg Wunsch :
> As Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>
>> What do you propose?
>
> I'm fine with that option, and think it's a good idea.
>
I have not objections against the patch.
Denis
As Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> What do you propose?
I'm fine with that option, and think it's a good idea.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for
Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
AVR-Libc comes with hand-optimized float support functions written
in assembler. These functions use the same naming conventions like
libgcc. There are situations where this name clashed lead
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>> AVR-Libc comes with hand-optimized float support functions written
>>> in assembler. These functions use the same naming conventions like
>>>
Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
AVR-Libc comes with hand-optimized float support functions written
in assembler. These functions use the same naming conventions like
libgcc. There are situations where this name clashed lead to performance
reg
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> AVR-Libc comes with hand-optimized float support functions written
> in assembler. These functions use the same naming conventions like
> libgcc. There are situations where this name clashed lead to performance
> regression because the f
19 matches
Mail list logo
