> -----Original Message----- > From: Georg-Johann Lay [] > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:00 PM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis; Richard Guenther; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Denis > Chertykov; Joerg Wunsch > Subject: Re: [Patch,avr] PR54461: Better AVR-Libc integration > > So here is an updated version of the patch. > Instead of "with_avrlibc = yes" it does "with_avrlibc != no". > > Just like the first version, --with-avrlibc[=*] is only recognized > if avr-gcc is not configured for RTEMS, i.e. RTEMS users don't need > to set --with-avrlibc=no in order to get a complete libgcc. >
Sorry, I'm a bit confused. With your new patch... - If I build GCC, for the avr target (plain), without specifying the --with-avr-libc=<> switch, does it default to "yes"? - If I build GCC, for the avr-rtems target, without specifying the --with-avr-libc=<> switch, does it default to "no"? Because the above is what I would expect the default behavior to be. Doing that would certainly help with backwards compatibility for those building toolchain distributions. I would think that the user has to specify the --with-avr-libc=<> flag to explicitly deviate from common usage and practice. Eric Weddington
