On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/24/2015 01:55 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe hte interrupt patches really need to wait for the next stage1.
>>> jeff
>>>
>>
>> X86 interrupt attribute was first submitted in September and it
>> is limited to x86 backend, except for
>>
On 11/24/2015 01:55 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
I believe hte interrupt patches really need to wait for the next stage1.
jeff
X86 interrupt attribute was first submitted in September and it
is limited to x86 backend, except for
TARGET_FUNCTION_INCOMING_ARG_RTL
which is no-op for other backends. We r
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/24/2015 01:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Just a note to folks, we're well into stage3 in our development cycle
>>> right
>>> now. Richi, Bernd, Jason, myself and others are worki
On 11/24/2015 01:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
Just a note to folks, we're well into stage3 in our development cycle right
now. Richi, Bernd, Jason, myself and others are working through our queues
of patches that were submitted before the deadline.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> Just a note to folks, we're well into stage3 in our development cycle right
> now. Richi, Bernd, Jason, myself and others are working through our queues
> of patches that were submitted before the deadline.
>
> If you are not currently iterati
Just a note to folks, we're well into stage3 in our development cycle
right now. Richi, Bernd, Jason, myself and others are working through
our queues of patches that were submitted before the deadline.
If you are not currently iterating with a maintainer on a patch that was
submitted befor
