On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/24/2015 01:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Just a note to folks, we're well into stage3 in our development cycle >>> right >>> now. Richi, Bernd, Jason, myself and others are working through our >>> queues >>> of patches that were submitted before the deadline. >>> >>> If you are not currently iterating with a maintainer on a patch that was >>> submitted before the close of stage1, please ping the patch, including a >>> link to the patch in the archives. >>> >>> >>> It's important we wrap up the loose ends and move our focus to bugfixing. >>> Speaking strictly for myself, the bar for what I'll consider will be >>> rising >>> daily from now until the release. >> >> >> FYI, I am planning to ping this patch >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02791.html >> >> to fix an ABI wrong code and this patch: >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02605.html >> >> which is a prerequisite for x86 interrupt attribute patch submitted >> weeks ago. > > I believe hte interrupt patches really need to wait for the next stage1. > jeff >
X86 interrupt attribute was first submitted in September and it is limited to x86 backend, except for TARGET_FUNCTION_INCOMING_ARG_RTL which is no-op for other backends. We really like to enable it in GCC 6. -- H.J.
