PowerPC patch ping^2

On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 03:32:31PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > I'd like to ping the following PowerPC patches: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/679312.html > rs6000: Ignore OPTION_MASK_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT differences in inlining > decisions [PR119327] > > https://gcc.gnu.

Patch ping^2 (Re: [PATCH] analyzer: Handle nonnull_if_nonzero attribute [PR117023])

Hi! On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 05:07:40PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > I'd like to ping the > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/668699.html > patch. > > The patches it depended on are already committed and there is a patch > which depends on this (the builtins shift from nonnu

C++ Patch ping^2

Hi! On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 11:48:20AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > I'd like to ping the following patches: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647445.html > PR111284 P2 > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/648215.html > PR114409 (part of a P1) > > http

Re: Patch ping^2

> Hi! > > I'd like to ping 2 patches: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/644580.html > > > PR113617 P1 - Handle private COMDAT function symbol reference in

Re: Patch ping^2

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:33 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Hi! > > I'd like to ping 2 patches: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-February/645326.html > i386: Enable _BitInt support on ia32 > > all the FAILs mentioned in that mail have been fixed by now. LGTM, based on HJ's advice.

Patch ping^2

Hi! I'd like to ping 2 patches: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/644580.html PR113617 P1 - Handle private COMDAT function symbol reference in readonly data

C++ patch ping^2

Hi! I'd like to ping a couple of C++ patches. - c++, v2: Implement C++26 P2169R4 - Placeholder variables with no name [PR110349] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/630802.html - c++: Implement C++26 P2361R6 - Unevaluated strings [PR110342] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail

Patch ping^2 Re: [PATCH 0/12] GCC _BitInt support [PR102989]

Hi! On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 05:24:02PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > Jakub Jelinek (12): > expr: Small optimization [PR102989] > lto-streamer-in: Adjust assert [PR102989] > phiopt: Fix phiopt ICE on vops [PR102989] > Middle-end _BitInt support [PR102989] > _BitInt lowerin

Re: [PATCH PING 2 (tree)] c++: source position of lambda captures [PR84471]

On 12/2/22 10:45, Jason Merrill wrote: Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? -- 8< -- If the DECL_VALUE_EXPR of a VAR_DECL has EXPR_LOCATION set, then any use of that variable looks like it has that location, which leads to the debugger jumping back and forth for both lambdas and structured

rs6000 patch ping^2: [PATCH 8/8] rs6000: Fix some missing built-in attributes [PR104004]

On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 02:18:00PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:50:26AM -0600, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote: > > PR104004 caught some misses on my part in converting to the new built-in > > function infrastructure. In particular, I forgot to mark a

Aarch64 patch ping^2

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:16:55AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Looks good to me. Richard E knows this code better than I do though, > > so I think he should have the final say. He's currently on holiday > > but will be back next week. > > I'd like to ping this patch. Ping. > > > 2021-03-18

Patch ping^2

Hi! I'd like to ping following patch: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-March/59.html > PR99490 dwarf2out -gsplit-dwarf ranges fixes Thanks Jakub

Patch ping^2

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 09:49:08AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > I'd like to ping the > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-February/565350.html > patch, P2 PR99085 ice-on-valid-code fix in fixup_partitions. Ping Thanks Jakub

[PATCH] PING^2 Add input_modes parameter to TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST hook

Hello, I would like to ping the following patch: Add input_modes parameter to TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST hook https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/562898.html It is needed for the following regression fix: IBM Z: Fix usage of "f" constraint with long doubles https://gcc.gnu.org/pipe

Re: OpenMP patch ping ** 2

Hi, I would like to ping the following OpenMP-related patches: On 27.11.20 17:09, Tobias Burnus wrote: OpenMP-related patch pings: Kwok's: * Re: [PATCH] openmp: Implicit 'declare target' for C++ static initializers https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559624.html * openmp:

C++ patch ping^2

Hi! I'd like to ping the updated bit_cast patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/557781.html Thanks Jakub

Re: [PATCH] [PING^2] Asan changes for RISC-V.

Original message here https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/557406.html This has non-RISC-V changes, so I need a global reviewer to look at it. Jim On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 12:10 PM Jim Wilson wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 4:59 PM Jim Wilson wrote: > >> We have only risc

Re: [PATCH ping 2] ppc64 check for incompatible setting of minimal-toc

Greetings again, Could you please look at this patch when convenient? --Doug On 6/1/20 10:13 AM, Douglas B Rupp wrote: Greetings, Curious if you've had a chance to look at this patch yet? --Doug On 5/18/20 4:02 PM, Douglas B Rupp wrote: Greetings, The attached patch is proposed for rs6000

Re: Patch ping^2

On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to ping this patch again: OK. Thanks, Richard. > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 01:28:19PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > I'd like to ping the > > https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2020-03/msg00154.html > > P1 PR94015 > > patch,

Patch ping^2

Hi! I'd like to ping this patch again: On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 01:28:19PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > I'd like to ping the > https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2020-03/msg00154.html > P1 PR94015 > patch, with the https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94015#c5 > testcase instead

Re: [C++ PATCH, PING^2] PR60531 - Wrong error about unresolved overloaded function

ping again On 26/04/2019 19:58, Harald van Dijk wrote: ping On 13/04/2019 10:01, Harald van Dijk wrote: Hi, For PR60531, GCC wrongly rejects function templates with explicitly specified template arguments as overloaded. They are resolved by resolve_nondeduced_context, which is normally called

Patch ping^2 (was Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix up C++ loop construct debug info without -gno-statement-frontiers (PR debug/90197))

On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 09:10:39AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 05:45:27PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > 2019-04-26 Jakub Jelinek > > > > PR debug/90197 > > * cp-gimplify.c (genericize_cp_loop): Emit a DEBUG_BEGIN_STMT > > before the condition (or if missi

Patch ping^2 (Re: [PATCH] ARM cmpsi2_addneg fix follow-up (PR target/89506))

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:43:29PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:04:01AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > The first one uses constraints and no C code in the output, I believe it is > > actually more expensive for compile time, because if one just reads what > > constrain_

Patch ping^2

Hi! I'd like to ping following patches: - PR85480 improve AVX512 128-bit insertion into 512-bit zero vector http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-04/msg01058.html - PR85572 implement absv2di2 and absv4di2 expanders for pre-avx512vl http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-04/msg01341.html Th

Patch ping^2

Hi! I'd like to ping the http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg01244.html - PR83157 - improve debug info for x86 setcc peepholes patch. Thanks. Jakub

Patch ping^2

Hi! I'd like to ping a bunch of patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg02521.html PR c++/83205 - diagnose invalid std::tuple_size::value for structured

Re: Patch ping^2

On 11/14/2017 08:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:22:36PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: I'd like to ping the: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01895.html PR debug/82718 Fix DWARF5 .debug_loclist handling with hot/cold partitioning patch. Thanks Ping^

Patch ping^2

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:22:36PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > I'd like to ping the: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01895.html > PR debug/82718 > Fix DWARF5 .debug_loclist handling with hot/cold partitioning > > patch. Thanks Ping^2. Jakub

[PATCH][PING^2] Fix PR81503 (SLSR invalid fold)

Ping. Thanks! Bill > On Aug 14, 2017, at 9:32 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to ping this patch, please. > > Thanks! > Bill > >> On Aug 3, 2017, at 2:34 PM, Bill Schmidt wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Here's v2 of the patch with Jakub's suggestions incorporated. Bootstrapped >> and

[patch][ping #2] Fix PR80929: Realistic PARALLEL cost in seq_cost.

Ping #2 https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg00096.html On 02.06.2017 09:53, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Hi, > > this small addition improves costs of PARALLELs in > rtlanal.c:seq_cost(). Up to now, these costs are > assumed to be 1 which gives gross inexact costs for, > e.g. divmod whic

Re: Patch ping^2

On 04/18/2017 07:55 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: I'd like to ping following patch: PR debug/80263 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg4.html avoid emitting sizetype artificial name into debug info OK. jeff

Patch ping^2

I'd like to ping following patch: PR debug/80263 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg4.html avoid emitting sizetype artificial name into debug info Thanks Jakub

Re: Patch ping^2

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:05:04AM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 02/13/2017 10:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I'd like to ping a couple of patches: > > > - C++ P1 PR79288 - wrong default TLS model for __thread static data members > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/ms

Re: Patch ping^2

On 02/13/2017 10:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Hi! I'd like to ping a couple of patches: - C++ P1 PR79288 - wrong default TLS model for __thread static data members http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg02349.html This is ok, but don't you think the changelog is misleading? In your

Re: Patch ping^2

On 02/13/2017 12:28 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: The reason for that VOID_TYPE_P stuff in COND_EXPR handling is not that stabilize_expr doesn't like it, but to avoid warning twice. If I replace all 3 VOID_TYPE_P tests (with the patch) in cp_build_modify_expr with 0 && VOID_TYPE_P, the above testcas

Re: Patch ping^2

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:44:54PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:41:48AM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > On 02/13/2017 10:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I'd like to ping a couple of patches: > > > > > > - C++ P1 PR79232 - ICEs and wrong-code with COM

Re: Patch ping^2

On 02/13/2017 10:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Hi! I'd like to ping a couple of patches: - C++ P1 PR79232 - ICEs and wrong-code with COMPOUND_EXPR on lhs of assignment http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg02341.html What puzzles me about (and may be an existing orthogonal issue), is t

Re: Patch ping^2

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:41:48AM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 02/13/2017 10:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I'd like to ping a couple of patches: > > > > - C++ P1 PR79232 - ICEs and wrong-code with COMPOUND_EXPR on lhs of > > assignment > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/

Patch ping^2

Hi! I'd like to ping a couple of patches: - C++ P1 PR79232 - ICEs and wrong-code with COMPOUND_EXPR on lhs of assignment http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg02341.html - C++ P1 PR79288 - wrong default TLS model for __thread static data members http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-

[PATCH, PING*2] DWARF: space-optimize loc. descr. for integer literals on 32-bit targets

Hello, Ping for the patch submitted at . Thanks! -- Pierre-Marie de Rodat

FW: [RFA] Compact EH Patch [Ping * 2]

Ping, Ping. -Original Message- From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Moore, Catherine Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 9:22 AM To: Richard Henderson; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: ja...@redhat.com; Matthew Fortune Subject: RE: [RFA] Compact E

[PATCH][PING^2][C++] Fix PR67333

PING. On 08/27/2015 09:27 PM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote: > Hi. > This patch fixes a rejects-valid bug related to volatile-qualified arguments > of > constexpr functions. This is essentially a one-line change in constexpr.c. > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for trunk? > > gcc/c

[PATCH, PING*2] DWARF: materialize subprogram renamings in Ada as imported declarations

On 07/25/2015 09:44 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote: This change makes GCC materialize subprogram renamings in Ada as imported declarations (DW_TAG_imported_declarations). For instance, procedure Foo renames Bar; will output: DW_TAG_imported_declaration: DW_AT_name: foo

[PATCH, PING*2] PR rtl-optimization/66790: uninitialized registers handling in REE

On 07/19/2015 12:14 AM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote: This patch is an attempt to fix PR rtl-optimization/66790: please see for the context. This adds a new dataflow problem (MIR for Must-Initialized Registers) and use it in the REE pass to remo

[PATCH, PING*2] Track indirect calls for call site information in debug info.

On 07/20/2015 02:45 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote: On PowerPC targets with -mlongcall, most subprogram calls are turned into indirect calls: the call target is read from a register even though it is compile-time known. This makes it difficult for machine code static analysis engines to recover

[PATCH, PING*2] PR debug/53927: fix value for DW_AT_static_link

On 07/20/2015 09:39 AM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote: This patch fixes the static link description in DWARF to comply with the specification. In order to do so, it appends a field to all FRAME objects to hold the frame base address (DW_AT_frame_base) so that the nested subrograms can directly refe

Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Skip preprocessor directives in mklog

On 05/12/2015 09:19 AM, Yury Gribov wrote: On 04/30/2015 12:03 PM, Yury Gribov wrote: On 04/21/2015 02:26 PM, Yury Gribov wrote: Hi all, Contrib/mklog is currently faked by preprocessor directives inside functions to produce invalid ChangeLog. The attached patch fixes this. Tested with my lo

Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Skip preprocessor directives in mklog

On 05/12/2015 10:14 AM, Yury Gribov wrote: On 05/12/2015 06:57 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:33:28PM +0300, Yury Gribov wrote: On 05/12/2015 06:23 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: The patch looks fine to me. I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest t

Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Skip preprocessor directives in mklog

On 05/12/2015 06:57 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:33:28PM +0300, Yury Gribov wrote: On 05/12/2015 06:23 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: The patch looks fine to me. I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest that this script should be maintained by whoe

Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Skip preprocessor directives in mklog

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: > I'm not a good choice to be the maintainer of a perl script. I'm all kinds of sorry about the original choice of scripting language. I'd just spend a couple of hours re-writing it in python.

Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Skip preprocessor directives in mklog

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:33:28PM +0300, Yury Gribov wrote: > On 05/12/2015 06:23 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: > >The patch looks fine to me. > > > >I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest > >that this script should be maintained by whoever's been hacking on it > >the most.

Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Skip preprocessor directives in mklog

On 12-05-15 17:33, Yury Gribov wrote: On 05/12/2015 06:23 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: The patch looks fine to me. I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest that this script should be maintained by whoever's been hacking on it the most. It's a simple script, so it shouldn'

Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Skip preprocessor directives in mklog

On 05/12/2015 06:23 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: The patch looks fine to me. I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest that this script should be maintained by whoever's been hacking on it the most. It's a simple script, so it shouldn't be hard to find a new maintainer for

Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Skip preprocessor directives in mklog

The patch looks fine to me. I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest that this script should be maintained by whoever's been hacking on it the most. It's a simple script, so it shouldn't be hard to find a new maintainer for it. Diegop. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:19 AM

[PATCH][PING^2] Skip preprocessor directives in mklog

On 04/30/2015 12:03 PM, Yury Gribov wrote: On 04/21/2015 02:26 PM, Yury Gribov wrote: Hi all, Contrib/mklog is currently faked by preprocessor directives inside functions to produce invalid ChangeLog. The attached patch fixes this. Tested with my local mklog testsuite and http://paste.debian.

Patch ping^2: [PATCH] -fsanitize=vptr instrumentation (take 2)

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:05:46PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 01:44:50PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 05:16:05PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > Here is an updated patch, ok if bootstrap/testing passes (so far just > > > checked with > > > mak

Re: [PATCH] [PING^2] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758

On 20.05.2014 17:16, Richard Earnshaw wrote: On 20/05/14 14:12, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: The following PR is opened for this problem: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61223 Thumb1 failure was also detected and reported in pr60758. I've proposed a thumb1 bugfix there. Regtest for

Re: [PATCH] [PING^2] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758

On 20/05/14 14:12, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > >> >> The following PR is opened for this problem: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61223 >> >> Thumb1 failure was also detected and reported in pr60758. >> I've proposed a thumb1 bugfix there. Regtest for the fix currently is in >> p

Re: [PATCH] [PING^2] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758

The following PR is opened for this problem: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61223 Thumb1 failure was also detected and reported in pr60758. I've proposed a thumb1 bugfix there. Regtest for the fix currently is in progress. Patches must be proposed on gcc-patches and / or in thi

Re: [PATCH] [PING^2] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758

On 20.05.2014 16:25, Richard Earnshaw wrote: On 16/05/14 14:56, Alexey Merzlyakov wrote: On 07.05.2014 13:28, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On 05/07/14 09:19, Yury Gribov wrote: Original Message Subject: [PING] [PATCH] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:48:12

Re: [PATCH] [PING^2] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758

On 16/05/14 14:56, Alexey Merzlyakov wrote: > On 07.05.2014 13:28, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >> On 05/07/14 09:19, Yury Gribov wrote: >>> Original Message >>> Subject: [PING] [PATCH] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758 >>> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:48:12 +0400 >>> From: Alexey Merzlyakov

Re: [PATCH PING^2] Simplify a VEC_SELECT fed by its own inverse

On 05/19/14 07:10, Bill Schmidt wrote: Hi, I'd like to once again ping this patch from 2014-04-22: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01319.html OK for the trunk. Thanks for your patience. jeff

[PATCH PING^2] Simplify a VEC_SELECT fed by its own inverse

Hi, I'd like to once again ping this patch from 2014-04-22: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01319.html Thanks! Bill

Re: [PATCH] [PING^2] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758

On 07.05.2014 13:28, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On 05/07/14 09:19, Yury Gribov wrote: Original Message Subject: [PING] [PATCH] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:48:12 +0400 From: Alexey Merzlyakov To: Ramana Radhakrishnan CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org , Viac

Re: [PATCH] [PING^2] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758

On 05/07/14 09:19, Yury Gribov wrote: Original Message Subject: [PING] [PATCH] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:48:12 +0400 From: Alexey Merzlyakov To: Ramana Radhakrishnan CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org , Viacheslav Garbuzov , Yury Gribov Hi, This fixes in

Re: [PATCH] [PING^2] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758

Hi, On 05/07/2014 10:19 AM, Yury Gribov wrote: Original Message Subject: [PING] [PATCH] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:48:12 +0400 From: Alexey Merzlyakov To: Ramana Radhakrishnan CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org , Viacheslav Garbuzov , Yury Gribov Hi, T

[PATCH] [PING^2] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758

Original Message Subject: [PING] [PATCH] Fix for PR libstdc++/60758 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:48:12 +0400 From: Alexey Merzlyakov To: Ramana Radhakrishnan CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org , Viacheslav Garbuzov , Yury Gribov Hi, This fixes infinite backtrace in __cxa_end_cleanup

Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Fix for PR59600 (prohibit inlining if no_sanitize_address)

Richard wrote: What about updated patch? Ok if it passes bootstrap and regtesting. It does, commited in r207497. -Y

Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Fix for PR59600 (prohibit inlining if no_sanitize_address)

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Yury Gribov wrote: > Richard wrote: >> >> I think you can't rely on pointer equivalence of the lookup_attribute >> result so you want instead of > > > Thanks, makes sense. > > >> Please also name CIF_OPTION_MISMATCH as CIF_ATTRIBUTE_MISMATCH >> and say "function att

Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Fix for PR59600 (prohibit inlining if no_sanitize_address)

Richard wrote: I think you can't rely on pointer equivalence of the lookup_attribute result so you want instead of Thanks, makes sense. Please also name CIF_OPTION_MISMATCH as CIF_ATTRIBUTE_MISMATCH and say "function attribute mismatch" in the description. Done. What about updated patch?

Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Fix for PR59600 (prohibit inlining if no_sanitize_address)

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Yury Gribov wrote: > Original Message > Subject: [PATCH][PING] Fix for PR59600 (prohibit inlining if > no_sanitize_address) > Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:13:10 +0400 > From: Yury Gribov > To: GCC Patches > > Original Message > Sub

[PATCH][PING^2] Fix for PR59600 (prohibit inlining if no_sanitize_address)

Original Message Subject: [PATCH][PING] Fix for PR59600 (prohibit inlining if no_sanitize_address) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:13:10 +0400 From: Yury Gribov To: GCC Patches Original Message Subject: [PATCH] Fix for PR59600 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:42:31 +040

Re: [Fortran] Patch ping**2

Hi Tobias, ** PING ** On July 01, Tobias Burnus wrote: The following patches are pending to be reviewed: * http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00142.html OK if nobody else objects within 24 h. * http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00132.html This one is OK. * http://gcc.gnu.

Re: [Fortran] Patch ping**2

** PING ** On July 01, Tobias Burnus wrote: The following patches are pending to be reviewed: * http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00142.html * http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00132.html * http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00137.html It would help me tremendously if my l

Patch ping^2

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01100.html - C++ -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess support (C is already in)

Re: patch ping^2: PR 51516 (TM clone aliases)

On 01/07/2012 05:47 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > Patrick Marlier > PR middle-end/51516 > * trans-mem.c (get_cg_data): Traverse aliases if requested. > (ipa_tm_scan_calls_block): Update parameters to get_cg_data. > (ipa_tm_note_irrevocable): Same. > (ipa_tm_s

Re: patch ping^2: PR 51516 (TM clone aliases)

On 01/05/12 16:05, Richard Henderson wrote: On 01/06/2012 12:53 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg01088.html It looks like it would be cleaner to put the .alias dereferencing directly into get_cg_data. r~ Arghh, I knew you were going to say that. That

Re: patch ping^2: PR 51516 (TM clone aliases)

On 01/06/2012 12:53 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg01088.html It looks like it would be cleaner to put the .alias dereferencing directly into get_cg_data. r~

patch ping^2: PR 51516 (TM clone aliases)

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg01088.html

Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Vectorize conversions directly

Ping. On 10/28/2011 12:22 PM, Dmitry Plotnikov wrote: Here is the patch updated according to recent comments. 2011-10-28 Dmitry Plotnikov gcc/ * tree-cfg.c (verify_gimple_assign_unary): Allow vector conversions. * optabs.c (supportable_convert_operation): New function. * optabs.h (supportable

Re: Patch ping #2

On 05/31/2011 02:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg01182.html > > various debug info improvements (typed DWARF stack etc.) >

Patch ping #2

Hi! - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg01182.html various debug info improvements (typed DWARF stack etc.)

Re: Patch ping #2

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> Yes, I mean when -fstack-usage is enabled.  Thus, make >> -fstack-usage -Wframe-larger-than behave the same as >> -fstack-usage -Wstack-usage.  Or do you say that -Wstack-usage >> doesn't require -fstack-usage? > > Yes, -Wstack-usage doesn'

Re: Patch ping #2

> Yes, I mean when -fstack-usage is enabled. Thus, make > -fstack-usage -Wframe-larger-than behave the same as > -fstack-usage -Wstack-usage. Or do you say that -Wstack-usage > doesn't require -fstack-usage? Yes, -Wstack-usage doesn't require -fstack-usage. > If it doesn't then I hope -Wstack-u

Re: Patch ping #2

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> > Fix annoying gcov filename handling (gcov.c, 2 lines): >> >  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01380.html >> >> Ok. > > Thanks! > >> > Introduce -Wstack-usage: >> >  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01992.html >> >>

Re: Patch ping #2

> > Fix annoying gcov filename handling (gcov.c, 2 lines): > >  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01380.html > > Ok. Thanks! > > Introduce -Wstack-usage: > >  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01992.html > > I wonder if we can't simply use -Wframe-larger-than but with > the

Re: Patch ping #2

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: > Not as many as Jakub, but still. :-) > > > Fix annoying gcov filename handling (gcov.c, 2 lines): >  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01380.html Ok. > Introduce -Wstack-usage: >  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg0199

Patch ping #2

Not as many as Jakub, but still. :-) Fix annoying gcov filename handling (gcov.c, 2 lines): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01380.html Introduce -Wstack-usage: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01992.html Extend TYPE_DECL_IS_STUB trick (dwarf2out.c, 1 line): http:/

Re: Patch ping^2: RFA: Add makefile for cross-configuration torture test

On May 2, 2011, Joern Rennecke wrote: > 2010-04-14 Joern Rennecke > * config-list.mk: New file. Ok, thanks! -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighterhttp://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin Am

Patch ping^2: RFA: Add makefile for cross-configuration torture test

Quoting Joern Rennecke : 2010-04-14 Joern Rennecke * config-list.mk: New file. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg01044.html