On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 02:18:00PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:50:26AM -0600, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > PR104004 caught some misses on my part in converting to the new built-in
> > function infrastructure.  In particular, I forgot to mark all of the 
> > "nosoft"
> > built-ins, and one of those should also have been marked "no32bit".
> > 
> > Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with no regressions.
> > Is this okay for trunk?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> > 
> > 
> > 2022-01-27  Bill Schmidt  <wschm...@linux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > gcc/
> >     * config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.def (MFFSL): Mark nosoft.
> >     (MTFSB0): Likewise.
> >     (MTFSB1): Likewise.
> >     (SET_FPSCR_RN): Likewise.
> >     (SET_FPSCR_DRN): Mark nosoft and no32bit.
> 
> This patch fixes a P1 regression and from my (limited) understanding
> doesn't depend on any other patch in the series.
> 
> Is this ok for trunk (I agree some testcase coverage would be nice)?

I'd like to ping this again.

> > diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def 
> > b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> > index c8f0cf332eb..98619a649e3 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> > +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> > @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@
> >  ; processors, this builtin automatically falls back to mffs on older
> >  ; platforms.  Thus it appears here in the [always] stanza.
> >    double __builtin_mffsl ();
> > -    MFFSL rs6000_mffsl {}
> > +    MFFSL rs6000_mffsl {nosoft}
> >  
> >  ; This is redundant with __builtin_pack_ibm128, as it requires long
> >  ; double to be __ibm128.  Should probably be deprecated.
> > @@ -226,10 +226,10 @@
> >      MFTB rs6000_mftb_di {32bit}
> >  
> >    void __builtin_mtfsb0 (const int<0,31>);
> > -    MTFSB0 rs6000_mtfsb0 {}
> > +    MTFSB0 rs6000_mtfsb0 {nosoft}
> >  
> >    void __builtin_mtfsb1 (const int<0,31>);
> > -    MTFSB1 rs6000_mtfsb1 {}
> > +    MTFSB1 rs6000_mtfsb1 {nosoft}
> >  
> >    void __builtin_mtfsf (const int<0,255>, double);
> >      MTFSF rs6000_mtfsf {}
> > @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
> >      PACK_IF packif {}
> >  
> >    void __builtin_set_fpscr_rn (const int[0,3]);
> > -    SET_FPSCR_RN rs6000_set_fpscr_rn {}
> > +    SET_FPSCR_RN rs6000_set_fpscr_rn {nosoft}
> >  
> >    const double __builtin_unpack_ibm128 (__ibm128, const int<0,1>);
> >      UNPACK_IF unpackif {}
> > @@ -2969,7 +2969,7 @@
> >      PACK_TD packtd {}
> >  
> >    void __builtin_set_fpscr_drn (const int[0,7]);
> > -    SET_FPSCR_DRN rs6000_set_fpscr_drn {}
> > +    SET_FPSCR_DRN rs6000_set_fpscr_drn {nosoft,no32bit}
> >  
> >    const unsigned long long __builtin_unpack_dec128 (_Decimal128, \
> >                                                      const int<0,1>);
> > -- 
> > 2.27.0
> 
>       Jakub

        Jakub

Reply via email to