On 05/18/2018 02:49 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> In r260250, the condition
>
> if (integer_zerop (retval))
> continue;
>
> was added before checking retval was of pointer type which caused
> functions having return type apart from void *, to be marked as
> malloc. The attached patch g
On 05/18/2018 02:49 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> In r260250, the condition
>
> if (integer_zerop (retval))
> continue;
>
> was added before checking retval was of pointer type which caused
> functions having return type apart from void *, to be marked as
> malloc. The attached patch g
On Fri, 18 May 2018, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> In r260250, the condition
>
> if (integer_zerop (retval))
> continue;
>
> was added before checking retval was of pointer type which caused
> functions having return type apart from void *, to be marked as
> malloc. The attached patch get
Hi,
In r260250, the condition
if (integer_zerop (retval))
continue;
was added before checking retval was of pointer type which caused
functions having return type apart from void *, to be marked as
malloc. The attached patch gets rid of the above check since we do not
wish to mark function retu
