On 27 August 2012 18:15, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Unless anyone has objections I'm going to commit this to trunk,
> implementing Sebastian's idea to disable the verbose terminate handler
> and the "pure virtual function called" message, which write to stderr
> when a process terminates. This allows
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Mike Stump wrote:
> So, I was thinking about this a little... Native compilers usually want
> the pretty verbose stuff and can usually pay the price. Cross compilers
> as a class, are less able to pay the price. Maybe we want to default
> based merely on target != host?
On 28 August 2012 18:29, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Unless anyone has objections I'm going to commit this to trunk,
>
>> implementing Sebastian's idea to disable the verbose terminate handler
>> and the "pure virtual function called" message, which w
On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Unless anyone has objections I'm going to commit this to trunk,
> implementing Sebastian's idea to disable the verbose terminate handler
> and the "pure virtual function called" message, which write to stderr
> when a process terminates. This
Unless anyone has objections I'm going to commit this to trunk,
implementing Sebastian's idea to disable the verbose terminate handler
and the "pure virtual function called" message, which write to stderr
when a process terminates. This allows embedded systems to avoid
pulling in the demangler and
