Hi!
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:28:54 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 05:25:39PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Done. (I also reverted the gcc/cp/pt.c:tsubst_expr change which
> > motivated this patch; will include that with the patch adding support for
> > C++ templates usag
Hi Jakub!
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:36:24 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:31:32PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > So yes, I really prefer OMP_STANDALONE_CLAUSES over OMP_CLAUSES for
> > > everything.
> >
> > Like this (for trunk)?
> >
> > commit 300e28fce192cb56d73cb61
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 05:25:39PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Done. (I also reverted the gcc/cp/pt.c:tsubst_expr change which
> motivated this patch; will include that with the patch adding support for
> C++ templates usage with OpenACC directives.) OK for trunk?
Ok, thanks.
Jakub
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:31:32PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > So yes, I really prefer OMP_STANDALONE_CLAUSES over OMP_CLAUSES for
> > everything.
>
> Like this (for trunk)?
>
> commit 300e28fce192cb56d73cb61f787872643030f0bf
> Author: Thomas Schwinge
> Date: Wed Apr 29 16:18:49 2015 +02
Hi Jakub!
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:43:55 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 01:13:29PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:32:31 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > Yeah, it is a non-starter, it has unnecessary runtime overhead everywhere
> > > where it is use
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 01:13:29PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:32:31 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Yeah, it is a non-starter, it has unnecessary runtime overhead everywhere
> > where it is used.
>
> Huh. OMP_CLAUSES is currently used in a dozen places in
> cp/cp-gimp
Hi!
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:32:31 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Yeah, it is a non-starter, it has unnecessary runtime overhead everywhere
> where it is used.
Huh. OMP_CLAUSES is currently used in a dozen places in
cp/cp-gimplify.c, cp/pt.c, and gimplify.c. I've been expecting my
changed code to
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:28:55AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Yet, if that's a non-starter, I'll pursue this one:
Yeah, it is a non-starter, it has unnecessary runtime overhead everywhere
where it is used.
Jakub
Hi Jakub!
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:53:32 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 08:45:50PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > That said, what is the preferred approach to add support for
> > OACC_ENTER_DATA, OACC_EXIT_DATA, OACC_UPDATE? I'm not sure hard-coding
> > TREE_OPERAND (t, 0
