> > I plan to reduce the value during before christmas after bit more testing
> > since
> > it seems to be overall win even if we trade fatigue2 performance, but I
> > would
> > like to get more testing on larger C++ APPs first.
>
> Will this hurt -Os -finline-limit=0 ?
Why do you use -finline-
On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 16:07:01 +0100
Jan Hubicka via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
> as dicussed in PR ipa/103454 there are several benchmarks that regresses
> for -finline-functions-called once. Runtmes:
> - tramp3d with -Ofast. 31%
> - exchange2 with -Ofast 11-21%
> - roms O2 9%-10%
> - tonto 2.5-3
Hi,
as dicussed in PR ipa/103454 there are several benchmarks that regresses
for -finline-functions-called once. Runtmes:
- tramp3d with -Ofast. 31%
- exchange2 with -Ofast 11-21%
- roms O2 9%-10%
- tonto 2.5-3.5% with LTO
Build times:
- specfp2006 41% (mostly wrf that builds 71% faster)
- sp
