On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Besides:
> +FAIL: gcc.dg/iec-559-macros-9.c (test for excess errors)
>
> that this patch supposedly fixes on i686-linux I'm also seeing:
>
> +FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/save-temps-1.c -O0 -g -I. -Dwith_PCH (test for excess
> errors)
I see no obvious reason for
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 01:14:46AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> HJ's regression tester shows the new test gcc.dg/iec-559-macros-9.c
> failing for 32-bit x86. It turns out the excess precision handling
> for determining the value of __GCC_IEC_559 has two problems:
> flag_excess_precision hasn't
HJ's regression tester shows the new test gcc.dg/iec-559-macros-9.c
failing for 32-bit x86. It turns out the excess precision handling
for determining the value of __GCC_IEC_559 has two problems:
flag_excess_precision hasn't been initialized at the point it's
tested, so flag_excess_precision_cmdli
