On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Besides: > +FAIL: gcc.dg/iec-559-macros-9.c (test for excess errors) > > that this patch supposedly fixes on i686-linux I'm also seeing: > > +FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/save-temps-1.c -O0 -g -I. -Dwith_PCH (test for excess > errors)
I see no obvious reason for PCH issues connected with my patch or this fix - I'd expect PCH to care only at most about whether the predefined macros are consistent between different compilations for which they should be consistent, not whether they are correct - but I suppose that if whether flag_excess_precision was initialized at the relevant time depended on compiler options, that could have resulted in an inconsistency affecting PCH. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
