On 18/12/15 21:59 +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Here's a fix for the regression that the patch introduced. Tested with
-m32 on Linux-X64.
OK, thanks for the quick turnaround.
On 18 December 2015 at 16:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> It only occurs to me now (rather than when I first suggested this
> change) that it changes behaviour for users who have replaced operator
> new, but not replaced the nothrow_t version.
>
> But I can't believe that anyone would replace operato
On 17/12/15 00:38 +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On 17 December 2015 at 00:12, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
Tested on Linux-PPC64.
2015-12-17 Ville Voutilainen
PR libstdc++/68276
* src/c++11/ios.cc (_M_grow_words): Use nothrow new.
* testsuite/27_io/ios_base/storage/11584.cc: Adj
On 17 December 2015 at 00:12, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
> Tested on Linux-PPC64.
>
> 2015-12-17 Ville Voutilainen
>
> PR libstdc++/68276
>
> * src/c++11/ios.cc (_M_grow_words): Use nothrow new.
> * testsuite/27_io/ios_base/storage/11584.cc: Adjust.
Shock horror, inconsistent indenta
Tested on Linux-PPC64.
2015-12-17 Ville Voutilainen
PR libstdc++/68276
* src/c++11/ios.cc (_M_grow_words): Use nothrow new.
* testsuite/27_io/ios_base/storage/11584.cc: Adjust.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ios.cc b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ios.cc
index 4adc701..4241bef 100644
