On 17 December 2015 at 00:12, Ville Voutilainen
<ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tested on Linux-PPC64.
>
> 2015-12-17  Ville Voutilainen  <ville.voutilai...@gmail.com>
>
>     PR libstdc++/68276
>
>     * src/c++11/ios.cc (_M_grow_words): Use nothrow new.
>     * testsuite/27_io/ios_base/storage/11584.cc: Adjust.

Shock horror, inconsistent indentation introduced by the patch. Fixed by the
attached patch.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ios.cc b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ios.cc
index 4adc701..f701e61 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ios.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ios.cc
@@ -121,9 +121,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
        if (__ix < numeric_limits<int>::max())
          {
            __newsize = __ix + 1;
-           __try
-             { __words = new _Words[__newsize]; }
-           __catch(const std::bad_alloc&)
+           __words = new (std::nothrow) _Words[__newsize];
+           if (!__words)
              {
                _M_streambuf_state |= badbit;
                if (_M_streambuf_state & _M_exception)
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/ios_base/storage/11584.cc 
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/ios_base/storage/11584.cc
index 0c80795..ae680c7 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/ios_base/storage/11584.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/ios_base/storage/11584.cc
@@ -26,14 +26,14 @@
 
 int new_fails;
 
-void* operator new(std::size_t n) throw (std::bad_alloc)
+void* operator new(std::size_t n, const std::nothrow_t&) throw()
 {
   if (new_fails)
-    throw std::bad_alloc();  
+    return 0;
   return malloc(n);
 }
-void* operator new[] (std::size_t n) throw (std::bad_alloc)
-{ return operator new(n); }
+void* operator new[] (std::size_t n, const std::nothrow_t& ntt) throw()
+{ return operator new(n, ntt); }
 
 void operator delete (void *p) throw() { free(p); }
 void operator delete[] (void *p) throw() { operator delete(p); }

Reply via email to