Thank you!
Guys who is able to write, could you please check-in my changes?
K
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This is a ping.
>>
>> Is the patch ok for trunk?
>
> OK.
>
> Thanks,
> Uros.
>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hi,
> This is a ping.
>
> Is the patch ok for trunk?
OK.
Thanks,
Uros.
Hi,
This is a ping.
Is the patch ok for trunk?
Thanks, K
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:52 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> Thanks for your objections.
>>
>> HJ, I scanned all AVX2 tests. So, every tests has at least which
>> distinguishe
Hi!
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 06:04:20AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Please check ALL AVX2 tests to see if they have similar problems.
Checking all current i386 tests revealed another problematic testcase:
grep scan-assembler' "[a-z0-9]*"' testsuite/gcc.target/i386/*.c | grep
'\(.*\).*"\1"'
(minmax-*
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Thanks for your objections.
>
> HJ, I scanned all AVX2 tests. So, every tests has at least which
> distinguishes it from filename:
> $ pwd
> /export/users/kyukhin/ws/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386
> $ grep "scan-assembler" avx2
Hi guys,
Thanks for your objections.
HJ, I scanned all AVX2 tests. So, every tests has at least which
distinguishes it from filename:
$ pwd
/export/users/kyukhin/ws/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386
$ grep "scan-assembler" avx2-* |grep -v "\t" |wc -l
0
Uros, you're right. Patch contains usless f
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> According to Jakub's input, I've updated test to scan instruction, not
> pattern name.
>
> Is it ok?
>
> Thanks, K
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Here is a fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> According to Jakub's input, I've updated test to scan instruction, not
> pattern name.
>
> Is it ok?
>
> Thanks, K
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Here is a fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
According to Jakub's input, I've updated test to scan instruction, not
pattern name.
Is it ok?
Thanks, K
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hi,
> Here is a fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182
>
> testsuite/ChangeLog entry:
>
> 2011-08-26 Kirill Yukhin
Hi,
Here is a fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182
testsuite/ChangeLog entry:
2011-08-26 Kirill Yukhin
PR testsuite/50185
* gcc.target/i386/avx2-vmovmskb-2.c: Rename to ...
* gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpmovmskb-2.c: ... this. Update.
Test passes.
Ok fo
10 matches
Mail list logo