On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > Thanks for your objections. > > HJ, I scanned all AVX2 tests. So, every tests has at least <tab> which > distinguishes it from filename: > $ pwd > /export/users/kyukhin/ws/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386 > $ grep "scan-assembler" avx2-* |grep -v "\t" |wc -l > 0 > > Uros, you're right. Patch contains usless file. Updated one is attached. > > Thanks, K > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:04 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> According to Jakub's input, I've updated test to scan instruction, not >>> pattern name. >>> >>> Is it ok? >>> >>> Thanks, K >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> Here is a fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 >>>> >>>> testsuite/ChangeLog entry: >>>> >>>> 2011-08-26 Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@intel.com> >>>> >>>> PR testsuite/50185 >>>> * gcc.target/i386/avx2-vmovmskb-2.c: Rename to ... >>>> * gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpmovmskb-2.c: ... this. Update. >>>> >>>> Test passes. >>>> Ok for trunk? >>>> >>>> Thanks, K >>>> >>> >> >> Please check ALL AVX2 tests to see if they have similar problems.
Thanks. -- H.J.
