On Tue, 12 May 2015, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> It turns out that besides the top-level ones there are more
> copied-from-automake
> files in various library dirs - where some of them seem quite outdated
> actually:
>
> libffi/mdate-sh
> libjava/classpath/INSTALL
> libjava/libltdl/con
On 05/12/2015 10:45 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> On 05/11/2015 07:55 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Sat, 9 May 2015, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>
>>> But maybe you would like it better if we update, for instance, to:
>>> automake-1.14 _and_ autoconf-2.69 ?
>>
>> Updating to current automake and
On Tue, 12 May 2015, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> On 05/11/2015 07:55 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 May 2015, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> >
> >> But maybe you would like it better if we update, for instance, to:
> >> automake-1.14 _and_ autoconf-2.69 ?
> >
> > Updating to current automak
On 05/11/2015 07:55 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 9 May 2015, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> But maybe you would like it better if we update, for instance, to:
>> automake-1.14 _and_ autoconf-2.69 ?
>
> Updating to current automake and autoconf release versions (but still
> using git versions
On Sat, 9 May 2015, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> But maybe you would like it better if we update, for instance, to:
> automake-1.14 _and_ autoconf-2.69 ?
Updating to current automake and autoconf release versions (but still
using git versions of the toplevel scripts, not those from particular
rele
Hi,
On Fri, 8 May 2015 20:20:55, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 May 2015, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> But it made the in-tree gmp configure script fail. That would not
>> have happened if we did not pass our version of missing to a sub-
>> module like gmp, that already has a working missing
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> But it made the in-tree gmp configure script fail. That would not
> have happened if we did not pass our version of missing to a sub-
> module like gmp, that already has a working missing script that behaves
> differently.
However, that's still not an
Hi,
On Fri, 8 May 2015 16:41:02, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 May 2015, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> One example where there is an incompatibility is "missing":
>>
>> Formerly it had code that emulated the missing "flex" by
>> creating a dummy lex.yy.c from the hopefully installed
>> pre-com
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> One example where there is an incompatibility is "missing":
>
> Formerly it had code that emulated the missing "flex" by
> creating a dummy lex.yy.c from the hopefully installed
> pre-compiled flex output file. But the version from the
> trunk does not
Hi,
On Thu, 7 May 2015 15:25:14, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 May 2015, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> But that is not the case for other tool scripts. I think these should
>> be in-sync with the automake version that creates the configure scripts
>> that make use of them.
>
> At least some o
On Thu, 7 May 2015, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> But that is not the case for other tool scripts. I think these should
> be in-sync with the automake version that creates the configure scripts
> that make use of them.
At least some of these scripts are also usable other than from
automake-generate
Hi,
On Wed, 6 May 2015 15:55:57, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2015, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>
>> Am 2015-05-05 um 18:03 schrieb Michael Haubenwallner:
>>> Now that gcc-5 is out, what about an automake-1.11.6 update for gcc-6?
>>
>> Patch for top-level files.
>
> I don't think this
On Wed, 6 May 2015, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Am 2015-05-05 um 18:03 schrieb Michael Haubenwallner:
> > Now that gcc-5 is out, what about an automake-1.11.6 update for gcc-6?
>
> Patch for top-level files.
I don't think this top-level patch is a good idea. These are *not*
generated files,
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:50:57AM +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>
> Am 2015-05-05 um 18:03 schrieb Michael Haubenwallner:
> > Now that gcc-5 is out, what about an automake-1.11.6 update for gcc-6?
>
> Patch for top-level files.
> 2015-05-06 Michael Haubenwallner
>
> Use automake-
Am 2015-05-05 um 18:03 schrieb Michael Haubenwallner:
> Now that gcc-5 is out, what about an automake-1.11.6 update for gcc-6?
Patch for top-level files.
2015-05-06 Michael Haubenwallner
Use automake-1.11.6.
compile: Recreate.
config.guess: Recreate.
config.sub: Recreate.
depcomp: Recreat
15 matches
Mail list logo
