On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 02:02:38PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 11/4/19 1:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Note, pr66199-1.f90 has the same issue. And I'd probably go for the
> > removal of dg-do run instead.
>
> Well, there are even more (ignoring those which have -std=legacy or
> -fno-inline
On 11/4/19 1:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Note, pr66199-1.f90 has the same issue. And I'd probably go for the
removal of dg-do run instead.
Well, there are even more (ignoring those which have -std=legacy or
-fno-inline or … in dg-options):
libgomp.fortran/examples-4/declare_target-5.f90,
lib
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 01:18:58PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> This test case had from the beginning both
> ! { dg-do run }
> ! { dg-options "-O2" }
>
> However, 'dg-do run' implies torture, i.e. multiple optimization options,
> while 'dg-options "-O2"' implies -O2, only.
>
> This means that
This test case had from the beginning both
! { dg-do run }
! { dg-options "-O2" }
However, 'dg-do run' implies torture, i.e. multiple optimization options,
while 'dg-options "-O2"' implies -O2, only.
This means that the test case is compiled 4 times with
"-O0", "-O1", "-O3 -f…" and "-Os" – fol
