On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 02:02:38PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 11/4/19 1:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Note, pr66199-1.f90 has the same issue. And I'd probably go for the
> > removal of dg-do run instead.
>
> Well, there are even more (ignoring those which have -std=legacy or
> -fno-inline or … in dg-options):
> libgomp.fortran/examples-4/declare_target-5.f90,
> libgomp.fortran/taskloop[234].f90
>
> libgomp.fortran/examples-4/declare_target-5.f90:! { dg-do run { target
> vect_simd_clones } }
That vect_simd_clones can't be dropped of course.
> I assume, you prefer no "dg-do run" for those as well:
> How about the attached patch?
But your patch doesn't do that, so ok for trunk.
> 2019-11-04 Tobias Burnus <tob...@codesourcery.com>
>
> * testsuite/libgomp.fortran/pr66199-1.f90: Remove
> 'dg-do run' (implies torture test) as 'dg-options "O2"' is used.
> * testsuite/libgomp.fortran/pr66199-2.f90: Ditto.
> * testsuite/libgomp.fortran/taskloop2.f90: Ditto.
> * testsuite/libgomp.fortran/taskloop3.f90: Ditto.
> * testsuite/libgomp.fortran/taskloop4.f90: Ditto.
Jakub
