[patch] fortran/intrinsic.texi: Improve SIGNAL intrinsic entry (was: [patch] fortran/intrinsic.texi: Add 'passed by value' to signal handler)

2023-10-17 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi Harald, On 16.10.23 20:31, Harald Anlauf wrote: Hi Tobias, Am 16.10.23 um 19:11 schrieb Tobias Burnus: OK for mainline? I think the patch qualifies as obvious. While at it, you might consider removing the comment a few lines below the place you are changing, @c TODO: What should the int

Re: [patch] fortran/intrinsic.texi: Add 'passed by value' to signal handler

2023-10-16 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:31:20PM +0200, Harald Anlauf wrote: > > Am 16.10.23 um 19:11 schrieb Tobias Burnus: > > Yesterday, someone was confused because the signal handler did not work. > > > > It turned out that the created Fortran procedure used as handler used > > pass by reference - and 'si

Re: [patch] fortran/intrinsic.texi: Add 'passed by value' to signal handler

2023-10-16 Thread Harald Anlauf
Hi Tobias, Am 16.10.23 um 19:11 schrieb Tobias Burnus: Yesterday, someone was confused because the signal handler did not work. It turned out that the created Fortran procedure used as handler used pass by reference - and 'signal' passed the it by value. This patch adds the 'passed by value' t

[patch] fortran/intrinsic.texi: Add 'passed by value' to signal handler

2023-10-16 Thread Tobias Burnus
Yesterday, someone was confused because the signal handler did not work. It turned out that the created Fortran procedure used as handler used pass by reference - and 'signal' passed the it by value. This patch adds the 'passed by value' to the wording: "@var{HANDLER} to be executed with a sing