Re: [patch] Update libstdc++ FAQ and ensure stable anchors in HTML docs

2014-06-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 22/06/14 22:40 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote: This fairly tedious patch refreshes the FAQ, including adding some notes saying "This answer is old and probably no longer relevant" to several answers referring to problems in the GCC 3.x era. I'm wonder

Re: [patch] Update libstdc++ FAQ and ensure stable anchors in HTML docs

2014-06-22 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote: This fairly tedious patch refreshes the FAQ, including adding some notes saying "This answer is old and probably no longer relevant" to several answers referring to problems in the GCC 3.x era. I'm wondering, should those old items be removed? GCC 3.x