On 22/06/14 22:40 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This fairly tedious patch refreshes the FAQ, including adding some
notes saying "This answer is old and probably no longer relevant" to
several answers referring to problems in the GCC 3.x era.

I'm wondering, should those old items be removed?  GCC 3.x is
really a looong while ago (and I did check some of those items).

Yes, that would probably be better. I considered doing that but didn't
want to spend the time to decide which ones to cull.

Suggestions are welcome.

A FAQ that containts many NAFAQs (not actually frequently asked questions) may actually be less useful and paint a more negative
picture.

Good point.

Reply via email to