On 06/26/2015 11:59 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 06/26/2015 05:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/25/2015 02:31 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I proposed including fold-const.h into gimple.h, but didn't notice that
its actually only needed by one i
On 06/26/2015 05:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/25/2015 02:31 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I proposed including fold-const.h into gimple.h, but didn't notice that
its actually only needed by one inline function. Moving that function to
gimple.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 02:31 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>>
>> I proposed including fold-const.h into gimple.h, but didn't notice that
>> its actually only needed by one inline function. Moving that function to
>> gimple.c means its no longer required.
>>
>
On 06/25/2015 02:31 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I proposed including fold-const.h into gimple.h, but didn't notice that
its actually only needed by one inline function. Moving that function to
gimple.c means its no longer required.
160 places need cgraph.h, so by removing this dependency, the numb
I proposed including fold-const.h into gimple.h, but didn't notice that
its actually only needed by one inline function. Moving that function to
gimple.c means its no longer required.
160 places need cgraph.h, so by removing this dependency, the number of
those files which still need fold-cons
