Hi Jonathan,
>>it does: {i386-pc, sparc-sun}-solaris2.1[01] bootstraps completed
>>successfully with it.
>
> Great. I hope the slightly-modified version I eventually checked in
> still works too :)
it does indeed, as just verified by a i386-pc-solaris2.11 bootstrap :-)
Rainer
--
--
On 25/09/14 13:05 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
almost there: now I only get
ld: fatal: libstdc++-symbols.ver-sun: 4622: symbol 'std::basic_ostream >::basic_ostream(std::basic_iostream >&)': symbol version conflict
ld: fatal: libstdc++-symbols.ver-sun: 4623: symbol 'std::basic_ostream
Hi Jonathan,
>>almost there: now I only get
>>
>>ld: fatal: libstdc++-symbols.ver-sun: 4622: symbol
>>'std::basic_ostream
>>>::basic_ostream(std::basic_iostream >&)':
>>symbol version conflict
>>ld: fatal: libstdc++-symbols.ver-sun: 4623: symbol
>>'std::basic_ostream
>>>::basic_ostream(std::b
On 25/09/14 07:11 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I'm tempted to tidy up the GLIBCXX_3.4 patterns in the linker script
quite considerably,
Paolo has done something like that this summer (motivated by -O0
builds) and reverted it for a detail, but it could
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I'm tempted to tidy up the GLIBCXX_3.4 patterns in the linker script
quite considerably,
Paolo has done something like that this summer (motivated by -O0 builds)
and reverted it for a detail, but it could be a good starting point.
--
Marc Glisse
On 24/09/14 15:48 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/09/14 16:38 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On 23/09/14 15:58 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
This patch broke Solaris bootstrap with Sun ld: when linking
libstdc++.so, ld complains
ld: fatal: libstdc++-symbols.ver-sun: 4520: symbol 'std
On 24/09/14 16:38 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On 23/09/14 15:58 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
This patch broke Solaris bootstrap with Sun ld: when linking
libstdc++.so, ld complains
ld: fatal: libstdc++-symbols.ver-sun: 4520: symbol 'std::basic_ios >::move(std::basic_ios >&&)': symbol
Hi Jonathan,
> On 23/09/14 15:58 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>This patch broke Solaris bootstrap with Sun ld: when linking
>>libstdc++.so, ld complains
>>
>>ld: fatal: libstdc++-symbols.ver-sun: 4520: symbol 'std::basic_ios> std::char_traits >::move(std::basic_ios> std::char_traits >&&)': symbol ve
On 23/09/14 15:58 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
This patch broke Solaris bootstrap with Sun ld: when linking
libstdc++.so, ld complains
ld: fatal: libstdc++-symbols.ver-sun: 4520: symbol 'std::basic_ios
>::move(std::basic_ios >&&)': symbol version conflict
and many more. In that case, I find that
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > - if (!__lhs_local && !__lhs_local)
> > + if (!__lhs_local && !__rhs_local)
> > std::swap(_M_word, __rhs._M_word);
> > else
> > {
>
> Wouldn't this be something for a (non-Wall?) warning?
> I mean if &
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:40:09AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 22/09/14 14:35 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >This adds move and swap functions to the iostream classes.
>
> This fixes a silly typo.
>
> Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
>
> commit acaef9854dff5f37d86b80fc8236df5fd
On 22/09/14 14:35 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This adds move and swap functions to the iostream classes.
This fixes a silly typo.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
commit acaef9854dff5f37d86b80fc8236df5fd90b0ca5
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date: Wed Sep 24 10:10:28 2014 +0100
PR
On 23/09/14 15:58 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
This patch broke Solaris bootstrap with Sun ld: when linking
libstdc++.so, ld complains
ld: fatal: libstdc++-symbols.ver-sun: 4520: symbol 'std::basic_ios
>::move(std::basic_ios >&&)': symbol version conflict
and many more. In that case, I find that
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> This adds move and swap functions to the iostream classes.
>
> Although this is a pretty large patch, it's a pure addition that only
> affects C++11 mode, and should have no effect on existing code because
> it won't be moving or swapping streams.
>
> I wanted to use C++
On 23/09/14 11:48 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/ctors10.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20140923/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/ctors10.C:16:46:
error: call of overloaded 'basic_ostream(NULL)' is ambiguous
Fixed by this
On 23/09/14 11:48 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jonathan Wakely writes:
Although this is a pretty large patch, it's a pure addition that only
affects C++11 mode, and should have no effect on existing code because
it won't be moving or swapping streams.
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/ctors10.C -s
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> Although this is a pretty large patch, it's a pure addition that only
> affects C++11 mode, and should have no effect on existing code because
> it won't be moving or swapping streams.
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/ctors10.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
Excess erro
This adds move and swap functions to the iostream classes.
Although this is a pretty large patch, it's a pure addition that only
affects C++11 mode, and should have no effect on existing code because
it won't be moving or swapping streams.
I wanted to use C++14's std::exchange so I added std::__
18 matches
Mail list logo
