On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> There is already statistics.h and tree-dump.h, why is dump_file not in
> tree-dump.h for example? I admit it's all some of a mess ;)
Because tree-dump.h is about tree dumps (and gimple dumps). Yes, it is a mess.
> But system.h
> doesn't
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>>> What about toplev.h? dump_file is defined there, after all. I don't mind
>>> it in system.h, if that's not a good place for it now. The patch is OK
>>> either way.
>>
>> I'd
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
>> What about toplev.h? dump_file is defined there, after all. I don't mind
>> it in system.h, if that's not a good place for it now. The patch is OK
>> either way.
>
> I'd prefer toplev.h, too. system.h is supposed to be for system head
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 12-05-31 14:57 , Steven Bosscher wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Almost all files include output.h because it defines dump_file. IMHO
>> output.h should only be included in files that actually output
>> something to asm_out_file. Therefore wante
On 12-05-31 14:57 , Steven Bosscher wrote:
Hello,
Almost all files include output.h because it defines dump_file. IMHO
output.h should only be included in files that actually output
something to asm_out_file. Therefore wanted to I move dump_file to
some other include file. I ended up with system
