Richard Sandiford writes:
> "Moore, Catherine" writes:
>> I'm testing a slightly different patch from the one that Steve posted:
>>
>> Index: mips.md
>> ===
>> --- mips.md (revision 199648)
>> +++ mips.md (working copy)
>> @@
"Moore, Catherine" writes:
> I'm testing a slightly different patch from the one that Steve posted:
>
> Index: mips.md
> ===
> --- mips.md (revision 199648)
> +++ mips.md (working copy)
> @@ -703,8 +703,13 @@
>
> ;; Is it a s
> -Original Message-
> From: Maciej W. Rozycki [mailto:ma...@codesourcery.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 8:50 PM
> To: Steve Ellcey; Moore, Catherine
> Cc: Richard Sandiford; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [patch, mips] Micromips delay slot fix
>
> On
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> Sorry, it should have been 'main(void) {return 0; }. Then you get (with
> the patch):
>
> j $31
> move$2,$0
>
> instead of:
>
> move$2,$0
> j $31
Hmm, something must have been missed then from the microMIP
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 23:13 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> > We found a bug in the micromips implementation where the branch delay slot
> > was not getting filled for micromips. You can reproduce this with a program
> > that just has an empty main
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> We found a bug in the micromips implementation where the branch delay slot
> was not getting filled for micromips. You can reproduce this with a program
> that just has an empty main function. Andrew Bennett created this fix for
> it and we would like
We found a bug in the micromips implementation where the branch delay slot
was not getting filled for micromips. You can reproduce this with a program
that just has an empty main function. Andrew Bennett created this fix for
it and we would like to check it in. I am submitting it for Andrew sinc
