Thanks Jakub and Alex,
I have committed the following to the branch to address your comments:
2016-01-15 Martin Jambor
* gimple.h: Fixed comment of gimple_statement_omp_single_layout
* omp-low.c (get_target_argument_value): Fixed spelling in its
comment.
(push_
Hi Martin,
while addressing Jakub's feedback can you also fix the typos below?
(noticed because I needed to reuse those hunks in gomp-nvptx)
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016, Martin Jambor wrote:
> +/* Return a target argument consisiting of DEVICE identifier, value
> identifier
> + ID, and the actual VALU
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:39:30PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> @@ -726,14 +730,14 @@ struct GTY((tag("GSS_OMP_CONTINUE")))
>tree control_use;
> };
>
> -/* GIMPLE_OMP_SINGLE, GIMPLE_OMP_TEAMS, GIMPLE_OMP_ORDERED */
> +/* GIMPLE_OMP_SINGLE, GIMPLE_OMP_ORDERED */
I think in this patch GIMPLE
Hi,
the patch in this email contains the changes to make our OpenMP
lowering and expansion machinery produce GPU kernels for a certain
limited class of loops.
The following is a re-post of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00718.html with a fair
amount of incorporate feedback, almost
