On 8/31/22 17:49, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 8/22/2022 3:39 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 4/28/22 18:10, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> As I mentioned in the original thread, my change to pr94157_0 was an
>>> attempt to avoid these warnings by passing a magic flag to the linker. Of
>>> cour
On 8/22/2022 3:39 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 4/28/22 18:10, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
As I mentioned in the original thread, my change to pr94157_0 was an attempt to
avoid these warnings by passing a magic flag to the linker. Of course we may
not be using GNU ld. Or we may be on a n
On 4/28/22 18:10, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> As I mentioned in the original thread, my change to pr94157_0 was an attempt
> to avoid these warnings by passing a magic flag to the linker. Of course we
> may not be using GNU ld. Or we may be on a non-elf target where the flag I
> used doe
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:52 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 7:54 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 9:59 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/28/2022 10:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 9:10 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> > > >
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 7:54 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 9:59 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/28/2022 10:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 9:10 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> > > wrote:
> > >> As I mentioned in the original thread, my change to pr94157_
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 9:59 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/28/2022 10:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 9:10 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >> As I mentioned in the original thread, my change to pr94157_0 was an
> >> attempt to avoid these warnings by passing a magic f
On 4/28/2022 10:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 9:10 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
As I mentioned in the original thread, my change to pr94157_0 was an
attempt to avoid these warnings by passing a magic flag to the linker.
Of course we may not be using GNU ld. Or we may b
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 9:10 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> As I mentioned in the original thread, my change to pr94157_0 was an
> attempt to avoid these warnings by passing a magic flag to the linker.
> Of course we may not be using GNU ld. Or we may be on a non-elf target
> where the fl
ur pruning facilities.
I'll be pushing this to the trunk and gcc-12 branch.
Jeffcommit af71f96631920f32ed9ec6c1c35d140dbe9992d1
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Thu Apr 28 12:03:52 2022 -0400
[committed] Fix more problems with new linker warnings
gcc/testsuite
* gcc.dg/
