On 4/28/22 18:10, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > As I mentioned in the original thread, my change to pr94157_0 was an attempt > to avoid these warnings by passing a magic flag to the linker. Of course we > may not be using GNU ld. Or we may be on a non-elf target where the flag I > used doesn't exist. Or we may even be on a ELF target where those bits > weren't added to the linker (frv). Furthermore, we need fixes to all the > nested function tests as well. > > So even though I initially resisted pruning the warning, that seems like the > best course of action. So this patch removes my recent change to pr94157_0 > and instead uses our pruning facilities. > > I'll be pushing this to the trunk and gcc-12 branch. > > Jeff
Hello. I noticed this patch during my GCC test-suite run with mold linker. As you likely now, the linker defaults to non-executable stack and so one sees test-suite crashes (not only warnings) [1]. So the question is if we want to explicitly fix all tests that rely on exectack? Or is it something we can assume as it's what GNU linkers do? List of affected tests: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/marxin/aadb75408a5a7867bf9fb26e879ce4c4/raw/aff2a0e4559e2dba8ea358520ca836eda6e7dc70/gistfile1.txt Thanks, Martin [1] https://github.com/rui314/mold/issues/427
