ings, line 18)
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.dg/gnu23-builtins-no-dfp-1.c (test for excess errors)
This is due to:
[...]/gcc.dg/gnu23-builtins-no-dfp-1.c:13:13: error: implicit declaration of function '__builtin_fabsd32'; did you mean '__builtin_fabsf32'? [-Wimplicit-function-decl
On 12/3/23 05:23, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On 2023-12-03T08:41:59+0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jeff Law:
Anyway, this test was the one I was most concerned about. Basically
we're testing that on a !dfp target that the builtins are not available.
It expects a warning, but gets an er
Hi!
On 2023-12-03T08:41:59+0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jeff Law:
>
>> Anyway, this test was the one I was most concerned about. Basically
>> we're testing that on a !dfp target that the builtins are not available.
>> It expects a warning, but gets an error by default now. I just
>> change
* Jeff Law:
> Anyway, this test was the one I was most concerned about. Basically
> we're testing that on a !dfp target that the builtins are not available.
> It expects a warning, but gets an error by default now. I just
> changed the test to use -fpermissive, so that the test behaves as i
Jeffcommit f37744662cbc74efcceb790b99dcd6521c51a578
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sat Dec 2 22:54:46 2023 -0700
[committed] Fix gnu23-builtins-no-dfp
Last patch for the night. There's still a bit of minor fallout left in GCC
(loongarch testsuite for example). But things are looking good on the
tar
